Continue Learning with FreeCME
Clinician.com and FreeCME Account Successfully Created
Your new Clinician account also gives you access to FreeCME, where you can take free accredited for CE credit
Your new Clinician account also gives you access to FreeCME, where you can take free accredited for CE credit
December 1, 2019 2 minutes read
Elected officials and other health agencies and advocacy groups are enacting many new requirements to combat the opioid epidemic.
“We can all agree that decreasing the use of opioids is the right thing to do for patients,” says Joseph Bosco, MD, professor in the department of orthopedic surgery at NYU Langone Health.
Physicians are morally obligated to lead the way in opioid reduction, Bosco adds. He and other research colleagues recently reviewed various interventions with an ethical lens.1
“The current opioid crisis generated immediate actions at many levels,” says Claudette Lajam, MD, the study’s lead author and an associate professor at NYU Langone Health, also in the department of orthopedic surgery. Regulatory requirements were implemented quickly. These placed seemingly arbitrary limits on prescribing, even for painful surgical procedures. “We wanted to examine the ethical implications of regulatory changes and physician-led changes,” Lajam says.
According to the analysis, these regulatory interventions are ethically sound:
“Arbitrary, one-size-fits-all limits on opioid prescribing were less ethically sound due to interfering with autonomy and nonmaleficence,” Lajam says.
The current opioid crisis generated immediate actions at many levels; regulatory requirements were implemented quickly. However, some of these placed seemingly arbitrary limits on prescribing, even for painful surgical procedures.
You have reached your article limit for the month. Subscribe now to access this article plus other member-only content.